The Jonathan Swift You Don’t Know

The Jonathan Swift You Don’t Know

This is the story of how Jonathan Swift–Anglican priest, author of Gulliver’s Travels, “A Modest Proposal,” and the best-selling book in England (next to the Bible) between 1700 and 1750–A Tale of a Tub–thwarted a plan to impoverish and economically enslave Ireland and helped create the modern Irish nationalist movement.

In 1720, one of my intellectual and moral heroes, Jonathan Swift, wrote a pamphlet advising the Irish to purchase goods manufactured in Ireland from Irish merchants.  He believed it was the way to a kind of economic independence from England that could lead to self-rule in Ireland with only a pledge of loyalty to the King.  This seems a mild and even quaint notion that we see on bumper stickers even now—“Buy American”—or less charitably—bumper stickers and slogans that suggest purchasing foreign-made products is a litmus test for patriotism at best and failure to do so is treasonous at worst.  This pamphlet outraged the English who could not get to the “anonymous” writer—though everyone knew it was Swift—and so settled for getting a corrupt judge, one William Whitshed, to go after the printer. Whitshed sent the jury out 11 times trying to force a guilty verdict but the jury refused to deliver one.

It is against this backdrop that a certain William Wood, a hardware manufacturer, received a patent in 1722 to produce copper coinage of £ 108,000—over £ 15 million or 24 million dollars in today’s currency to be used in Ireland.  He received this patent by bribing the Duchess of Kendal 10,000 pounds—approximately £ 1.4 million or 2.2 million dollars in today’s currency. She was the mistress of King George I so there was tacit royal approval and perhaps encouragement. 

          Swift saw that the practical effect of flooding Ireland with these copper coins would be that the Irish would give up their gold and silver and become economic slaves to the English.  The Irish wanted to have their own national bank and they wanted to mint their own coins.  In 1724 and 25 Swift wrote 7 “anonymous letters” in the character of a “Drapier”–a simple Irish merchant who loves God and country.  It was well known who the “Drapier” was but even by offering a reward in the staggering sum of 300 pounds (42,000 pounds or $66,000 in today’s currency) in a poor country the English power brokers were unable to find anyone to say that Swift was the author.

 

Swift’s political enemy, the Prime Minister Horace Walpole, became involved when the author of the Drapier’s Letters, particularly the 3rd and 4th ones, was accused of treason for arguing that the “Irish deserve independence from England but not from the king,” and that the Irish should have self-governance, their own national bank, etc. (The claims of treason were framed as “treason to the English Parliament.”) It is universally recognized that the Drapier’s Letters were the central force in defeating this proposal and sticking Wood with copper coinage that could not be used in Ireland.

Swift was justly recognized as a hero and through the persona of the Drapier, many critics have claimed that he was the first to organize a “more universal Irish community” in its modern sense—although we can debate exactly who constitutes that community.

In 1731 Swift, in the manner of many poets and writers, wrote his “death poem” though he would live until 1745.  In the late 1730s Swift was afflicted with Meniere’s Disease, an affliction of the inner ear which results in vertigo, severe vomiting, and a constant ringing in the ears.  In his death poem he addresses the “Drapier” episode and gives his vision of what satire should do.  Some of the names referred to, Scroggs and Tressilian—are famously corrupt judges. Swift himself is the “Dean.”

 “The Dean did by his pen defeat

An infamous destructive cheat.

Taught Fools their Int’rest how to know;

And gave them arms to ward the Blow.

Envy hath own’d it was his doing,

To save that helpless land from Ruin,

While they who at the Steerage stood,

And reapt the Profit, sought his blood.

   To save them from their evil Fate,

In him was held a Crime of State.

A wicked monster on the Bench,

Whose Fury Blood could never quench;

As vile and profligate a Villain,

As modern Scroggs, or old Tressilian;

Who long all Justice had discarded,

Nor fear’d he GOD, nor Man regarded;

Vow’d on the Dean his Rage to vent,

And make him in his Zeal repent;

But Heav’n his Innocence defends,

The grateful People stand his friends;

Not Strains of Law, nor Judges Frown,

Nor Topicks brought to please the Crown,

Nor Witness hir’d, nor Jury pick’d,

Prevail to bring him in convict.

…. 

Perhaps I may allow, the Dean

Had too much Satyr in his Vein;

And seem’d determin’d not to starve it,

Because no Age could more deserve it.

Yet, Malice never was his Aim;

He lash’d the Vice but spar’d the Name.

No individual could resent,

Where Thousands equally were meant.

His Satyr points at no Defect,

But what all Mortals may correct:

For he abhorr’d that senseless Tribe,

Who call it Humor when they jibe:

He spar’d a Hump or crooked Nose,

Whose Owners set not up for Beaux.

True genuine Dulness mov’d his Pity,

Unless it offer’d to be witty.

Those, who their Ignorance confess’d,

He ne’er offended with a Jest;

But laugh’d to hear an Idiot quote,

A Verse from Horace, learn’d by Rote.

   He knew an hundred pleasant Stories,

With all the turns of Whigs and Tories:

Was cheerful to his dying Day,

And Friends would let him have his Way.

   He gave the little Wealth he had,

To build a House for Fools and Mad:

And shew’d by one satiric Touch,

No Nation wanted [needed] it so much:

That Kingdom [Ireland] he hath left his Debtor,

I wish it soon may have a Better.”

 

 

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under Jonathan Swift

8 responses to “The Jonathan Swift You Don’t Know

  1. Charlie Kenny

    Pulpteacher – enjoyed the post and your reading same last evening.

  2. MARY KIM SCHRECK

    Fascinating look at Swift….and yes, I bet few know this….I only wonder: Where are the Jonathan Swifts of today that we need so badly?

    • Hi Mary Kim,

      You have anticipated me again! All I could think of when writing this was who are the Swifts of today? That is why I included his “definition” of satire at the end. We have plenty of people who engage in ridicule–but satire is fundamentally optimistic–you have to believe that people can learn and become better and the attack cannot be personal. I do not confuse cynicism and satire and Swift was a great satirist but he was no cynic.

      Pax,

      D

      Daniel J. McMahon, Ph.D. Principal DeMatha Catholic High School 4313 Madison Street Hyattsville MD 20781 240-764-2202 240-764-2275 fax

  3. John McGean

    Thanks, Dan. I love your posts. Your are the only real man of letters I know. I am a big Swift fan too. He was so bright, clever.

    • John, thanks so much. Swift is one of my heroes and the culminating chapter of my dissertation. I haven’t taught him in yers but perhaps when I get back to the classroom full time…. Dan

  4. Dan Sheerin

    Great stuff entirely, Dan. Thanks much.

    “He lash’d the Vice but spar’d the Name” … Indeed.

    As I’ve long been taught, effective communicators, managers, teachers, leaders, etc. will frequently focus their critique on the behavior or the issue at hand, and thus not personalize the critique. Of course, in certain situations it is clearly necessary and appropriate to focus the criticism on the individual himself. But, again, depending on the circumstances, that often not the best or most appropriate way to positively educated and influence.

    Seemingly our national political discourse would be far more civil and productive if more of American citizens would take to heart such methods.

  5. Dan Sheerin

    Also along these same lines, I’m currently reading a great book, The Green Flag; A History of Irish Nationalism,” by Robert Kee (first published in 1972, about 800 pages). It summarizes events from 1170 all the way up to about 1923. Swift is covered briefly, and thus quoted: “Burn everything English — except their coal.” The book also opens with this qoute, which is reinforced throughout the book by the work’s reports and reflections on Irish history:

    “The study of Irish history does not excite political animosity but leads to the very opposite result. Thoroughly to appreciate the history of this or any country it is necessary to sympathize with all parties … ”

    I’m certain Swift would agree.

  6. Although, I don’t recall studying Swift in Buck’s English class, I do remember that Buck loved English poets and writers. More than likely, he did say a word or two about Swift. I can relate to Swift’s indignation of flooding the Irish market with copper coins and in effect enslaving the Irish people with the “King’s” money. I have a blog myself, entitled, fedruin which is a testament to the deceit and corruption in our banking system, specifically, the Federal Reserve. The FED floods the system with their fake, fiat money which debases our dollar, causing the majority of problems in this country. Our dollar has lost over 95% of its value since the FED came into existence in 1913. Why? It’s because of a hidden tax called inflation. If you get the chance, take a look at my blog. I feel that most Americans are oblivious to how the FED has ruined this country. I just want to get the word out. Great post! I enjoyed the history lesson!!! Thanks. Buck would have been proud!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s